Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):23-31 (2002)
The theory of evolution has beenused in arguments regarding animalexperimentation. Two such arguments areanalyzed, one against and one in favor. Eachargument stresses the relevance of the theoryof evolution to normative ethics but attemptsexplicitly to avoid the so-called naturalisticfallacy.According to the argument against animalexperimentation, the theory of evolution`undermines' the idea of a special humandignity and supports `moral individualism'. Thelatter view implies that if it is wrong to usehumans in experiments, then it is also wrong touse animals, unless there are relevantdifferences between them that justify adifference in treatment. No such differencescan be found with regard to animals which lead`biographical lives'.The argument in favor of animal experimentationis based on evolutionary psychology. It statesthat humans, as all social animals, arespeciesist by nature and stresses that thisshould be taken seriously in normative ethics.This does not mean that animal interests shouldnot be considered, only that vital humaninterests may outweigh them.In order to assess the arguments, one has totake a stand on certain more basic issues: `is'versus `ought', impartiality versus specialobligations, and feelings/intuitions versusreason. Given the author's own position withregard to these more basic considerations, theevolutionary argument in favor of animalexperimentation is judged to be more convincingthan the one against but not decisive. It isalso maintained that not all animal experimentsare acceptable. Which animal experiments areacceptable and which are not has to be decidedon a case-by-case basis.
|Keywords||animal ethics animal experimentation evolution evolutionary psychology moral individualism moral intuitions naturalistic fallacy special obligations speciesism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Anthropocentric Paradigm and the Posibility of Animal Ethics.Elisa Aaltola - 2010 - Ethics and the Environment 15 (1):pp. 27-50.
The Ethics of Animal Experimentation: A Critical Analysis and Constructive Christian Proposal.Donna Yarri - 2005 - Oup Usa.
Util-Izing Animals.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
The Wild Animal as a Research Animal.Jac A. A. Swart - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):181-197.
A Vegetarian Critique of Deep and Social Ecology.David Waller - 1997 - Ethics and the Environment 2 (2):187 - 197.
Review of Putting Humans First: Why We Are Nature's Favorite by Tibor Machan. [REVIEW]Nathan Nobis - manuscript
Are Animals Moral? A Theological Appraisal of the Evolution of Vice and Virtue.Celia Deane-Drummond - 2009 - Zygon 44 (4):932-950.
Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Without a Tear: Our Tragic Relationship with Animals.Mark H. Bernstein - 2004 - University of Illinois Press.
Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics.Kirsten Schmidt - 2011 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):153-171.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads28 ( #181,786 of 2,163,624 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,037 of 2,163,624 )
How can I increase my downloads?