Annulment retributivism

Legal Theory 5 (4) (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

edition Anderson, Jami L. (1999) "Annulment Retributivism: A Hegelian Theory of Punishment". Cambridge University Press 5(4):363-388

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Richard L. Lippke.Bulk Discounts - 2011 - In Mark D. White (ed.), Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy. Oxford University Press. pp. 212.
Is Hegel a Retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2004 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 25 (1-2):113-126.
Is Hegel A Retributionist? Graduate Essay Prize Runner Up.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 49:113-126.
The epistemic argument against retributivism.Elizabeth Shaw - 2021 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 46 (2).
Why not ‘weak’ retributivism?Katrina L. Sifferd - 2021 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 46 (2):138-143.
A Hegelian Theory of Punishment.Jami L. Anderson - 1999 - Legal Theory 5 (4):363-388.
Fairness-Based Retributivism Reconsidered.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):481-498.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
41 (#548,119)

6 months
5 (#1,047,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jami L. Anderson
University of Michigan - Flint

Citations of this work

Is Hegel a Retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2004 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 25 (1-2):113-126.
Justifying Punishment.Theodore Y. Blumoff - 2001 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 14 (2):161-211.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references