Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):1 – 10 (2010)

Chrisoula Andreou
University of Utah
It is natural to assume that we would not be willing to compromise the environment if the conveniences and luxuries thereby gained did not have a substantial positive impact on our happiness. But there is room for skepticism and, in particular, for the thesis that we are compromising the environment to no avail in that our conveniences and luxuries are not having a significant impact on our happiness, making the costs incurred for them a waste. One way of defending the no-avail thesis fits neatly with what I will call the exalted view , according to which the key to human happiness lies in the mental (or spiritual) realm rather than in the material realm. After considering this familiar approach to defending the no-avail thesis, I sketch out a very different approach—one that will, I hope, appeal to those who have doubts about the familiar line of defense. The alternative and novel approach builds on a strand of empirical research on (self-reports concerning) happiness that suggests that we are, in a way, quite shallow, and that our happiness depends on whether we are keeping up with the Joneses. I call this view concerning happiness the worldly view . My reasoning suggests that even if the current rift between exalted pictures of human nature and happiness, on the one hand, and worldly pictures of human nature and happiness, on the other, cannot be repaired, it need not hinder agreement on the plausibility of the no-avail thesis; rather, with the rift come two different routes to the same thesis. I conclude that we should take the no-avail thesis very seriously, and that evidence that we are shallow materialists need not be bad news for the environment(alist)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13668790903553982
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 1863 - Cleveland: Cambridge University Press.
Walden.Sheila A. Laffey, Henry David Thoreau, Fred Cardin, Douglas S. Clapp & John D. Ogden - 1981 - First Run/Icarus Films (Distributor).
47 The Trouble With Wilderness.William Cronon - forthcoming - Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions.
The Structure of Hip Consumerism.Joseph Health - 2001 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (6):1-17.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Happiness.Dan Haybron - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hope in Environmental Philosophy.Lisa Kretz - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (5):925-944.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"Happiness" and Economics.Mark Chekola - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:175-180.
What is This Thing Called Happiness?Fred Feldman - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
The Habitual Route to Environmentally Friendly (or Unfriendly) Happiness.Cheryl Hall - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):19 – 22.
Comment on Andreou.Joseph Heath - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):23 – 26.
Materialism and Economics.Christopher Morgan-Knapp - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):27 – 30.
Getting to Less.Philip Cafaro - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):11 – 14.


Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #146,643 of 2,520,416 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,416 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes