Are the dorsal/ventral pathways sufficiently distinct to resolve perceptual theory?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):96-97 (2001)
Abstract
The author argues that the theory of a dorsal/ventral stream for visual processing can be used to reconcile the constructivist and direct perception theories. My commentary discusses neurophysiological and psychophysical studies that run counter to the view. In addition, the central issue of debate between the constructionist and direct perception approaches regarding what is visual information is discussed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X02220026
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reference, Perception, and Attention.Athanasios Raftopoulos - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (3):339 - 360.
Perceiving Pictures.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):461-480.
Pointing the Way to a Unified Theory of Action and Perception.Mel Goodale - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):749-750.
Where Does Perception End and When Does Action Start?Dennis J. McFarland - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):113-113.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

38 ( #137,271 of 2,177,962 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,962 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums