Chisholm's argument to show that a person cannot be an ens successivum

Philosophical Studies 37 (1):111 - 113 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00353509

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,203

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Towards Moral Machines: A Discussion with Michael Anderson and Susan Leigh Anderson.Michael Anderson, Susan Leigh Anderson, Alkis Gounaris & George Kosteletos - 2021 - Conatus 6 (1).
Chisholm on indirect attribution.Jane L. McIntyre - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 43 (3):409 - 414.
Der Durkheim‐Test. Anmerkungen zu Susan Leigh Stars Grenzobjekten.Sebastian Gießmann - 2015 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 38 (3):211-226.
In Memoriam: Susan Leigh Star.Adele E. Clarke - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (5):581-600.
Regions of the Mind: Brain Research and the Quest for Scientific Certainty by Susan Leigh Star. [REVIEW]Anne Harrington - 1991 - Isis 82:580-581.
Chisholm's foundationalism.Timm Triplett - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (2):141 - 153.
Chisholm's paralogism.William S. Robinson - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 36 (3):309 - 316.
"Reading Dance: Bodies and Subjects in Contemporary American Dance": Susan Leigh Foster. [REVIEW]Graham Mcfee - 1988 - British Journal of Aesthetics 28 (2):190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#426,724)

6 months
8 (#790,863)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references