Conceptualizing Rape as Coerced Sex

Ethics 127 (1):50-87 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several prominent theorists have recently advocated reconceptualizing rape as “nonconsensual sex,” omitting the traditional “force” element of the crime. I argue that such a conceptualization fails to capture what is distinctively problematic about rape for women and why rape is pivotal in supporting women’s gender oppression. I argue that conceptualizing rape as coerced sex can replace both the force and nonconsent elements and thereby remedies some of the main difficulties with extant definitions, especially in recognizing “acquaintance” rape as such. I argue that this approach helps explain its distinctive badness both for the individual victims and for women as a group.

Similar books and articles

Moral Injury and Relational Harm: Analyzing Rape in Darfur.Sarah Clark Miller - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):504-523.
Doxastic coercion.Benjamin McMyler - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):537-557.
The wrong of rape.David Archard - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):374–393.
Rape: A Philosophical Investigation.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1996 - Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Is There Psychological Adaptation to Rape?Randy Thornhill - 1994 - Analyse & Kritik 16 (1):68-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-04

Downloads
947 (#14,170)

6 months
111 (#33,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott Anderson
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

Bad Sex and Consent.Elise Woodard - 2022 - In David Boonin (ed.), Handbook of Sexual Ethics. Palgrave. pp. 301--324.
Coercion.Scott Anderson - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Rethinking the wrong of rape1.Karyn L. Freedman - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):104-127.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references