Philosophia 35 (3-4):361-370 (2007)

Authors
Abstract
This paper presents a feminist intervention into debates concerning the relation between human subjects and a divine ideal. I turn to what Irigarayan feminists challenge as a masculine conception of ‘the God’s eye view’ of reality. This ideal functions not only in philosophy of religion, but in ethics, politics, epistemology and philosophy of science: it is given various names from ‘the competent judge’ to the ‘the ideal observer’ (IO) whose view is either from nowhere or everywhere. The question is whether, as Taliaferro contends, my own philosophical argument inevitably appeals to the impartiality and omni-attributes of the IO. This paper was delivered during the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God
Keywords Apotheosis  Divine motivation theory  Divine women  Epistemic practice  Ideal observer  Idealization  Impartiality  Irigaray  Male-neutral  Philosophical imaginary  Testimonial sensibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-007-9083-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,029
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline.Bernard Williams - 2006 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sexes and Geneologies.Luce Irigaray - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline.Bernard Williams - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):477-496.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
148 ( #67,516 of 2,427,654 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #181,048 of 2,427,654 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes