In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007)
AbstractFeminist epistemology and philosophy of science studies the ways in which gender does and ought to influence our conceptions of knowledge, the knowing subject, and practices of inquiry and justification. It identifies ways in which dominant conceptions and practices of knowledge attribution, acquisition, and justification systematically disadvantage women and other subordinated groups, and strives to reform these conceptions and practices so that they serve the interests of these groups. Various practitioners of feminist epistemology and philosophy of science argue that dominant knowledge practices disadvantage women by (1) excluding them from inquiry, (2) denying them epistemic authority, (3) denigrating their “feminine” cognitive styles and modes of knowledge, (4) producing theories of women that represent them as inferior, deviant, or significant only in the ways they serve male interests, (5) producing theories of social phenomena that render women's activities and interests, or gendered power relations, invisible, and (6) producing knowledge (science and technology) that is not useful for people in subordinate positions, or that reinforces gender and other social hierarchies. Feminist epistemologists trace these failures to flawed conceptions of knowledge, knowers, objectivity, and scientific methodology. They offer diverse accounts of how to overcome these failures. They also aim to (1) explain why the entry of women and feminist scholars into different academic disciplines, especially in biology and the social sciences, has generated new questions, theories, and methods, (2) show how gender has played a..
Similar books and articles
Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense.Elizabeth Anderson - 1995 - Hypatia 10 (3):50 - 84.
Situating Feminist Epistemology.Louise M. Antony - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:31-40.
Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, 2nd ed.Ann Garry & Marilyn Pearsall (eds.) - 1996 - Routledge.
Feminist Scholarship in the Sciences: Where Are We Now and When Can We Expect A Theoretical Breakthrough?Sue V. Rosser - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):5 - 17.
Why gender is a relevant factor in the social epistemology of scientific inquiry.Kristina Rolin - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891.
Feminist bioethics: Toward developing a "feminist" answer to the surrogate motherhood question.Rosemarie Tong - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (1):37-52.
Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology.Kathleen Lennon & Margaret Whitford (eds.) - 1994 - Routledge.
Feminist epistemology: Implications for philosophy of science.Cassandra L. Pinnick - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (4):646-657.
Women, wellness, and the media.Chris la Barbera & Melissa Meade - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):158-164.
Language and Power.Lynne Tirrell - 1997 - In Alison M. Jaggar & Iris Marion Young (eds.), A Companion to Feminist Philosophy,. Blackwell.
The values of science: Empiricism from a feminist perspective.Nancy Tuana - 1995 - Synthese 104 (3):441 - 461.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
I—Culture and Critique.Sally Haslanger - 2017 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 91 (1):149-173.
Can the Behavioral Sciences Self-correct? A Social Epistemic Study.Felipe Romero - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60:55-69.
Perspectival objectivity.Peter W. Evans - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (2):1-21.
Toward Philosophy of Science’s Social Engagement.Angela Potochnik & Francis Cartieri - 2013 - Erkenntnis 79 (Suppl 5):901-916.
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology.Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
References found in this work
No references found.