Global Bioethics in the Post-Coronavirus Era: A Discussion with Roberto Andorno

Conatus 7 (1):185-200 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A discussion with Roberto Andorno about global bioethics and biolaw, the Coronavirus pandemic, and its impact on human dignity and rights. Can we foresee the emerging new profile of global bioethics and biolaw in the post-Coronavirus era? How significant are they going to be in the future, after the enormous pressure that the Coronavirus pandemic has exercised on key political, legal, and ethical values? Must the voice of bioethicists -compared to the ‘hard’ scientific data- be louder in the future concerning decisions about emergency social and medical measures? Is there a hope that public empowerment will support robust, global public engagement and meaningful deliberation? How much does Roberto Andorno’s view on human dignity reveal a supposed commitment to moral realism? The massive deaths of elderly people living in hospices of Sweden, Spain, and Italy, based on an implicit ‘fair innings’ view, has recently posed certain questions on the moral unacceptability of such practices. The same questions arise in the case of the legalization of euthanasia grounded on the implicit acceptance of the view that life is not worth living under certain circumstances. Is it possible that the human rights bodies worldwide will acquire executive power, and how could this become possible? How influential the ‘precautionary principle’ can become regarding clinical and research ethics in the future? How urgent is the importance of the introduction of bioethical education in the curricula of ‘hard’ empirical studies? Roberto Andorno discusses with us all these controversial and under heated public debate issues, giving sometimes provocative answers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Human Rights Approach to Bioethics.Roberto Andorno - 2016 - In José-Antonio Seoane & Pedro Serna (eds.), Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation. Cham: Springer Verlag.
The right not to know does not apply to HIV testing.Roberto Andorno - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):104-105.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):999-999.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):323-323.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):249-249.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):429-429.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3):483-483.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):475-475.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):633-633.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):97-97.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (1):121-121.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2):317-317.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):361-361.
Books received. [REVIEW]Roberto Andorno - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (4):655-655.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-02

Downloads
18 (#836,872)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roberto Andorno
University of Zürich