Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof: Confrontational Strategies in Dealing with Political Accountability

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):59-78 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, the author examines the burden of proof in the argu- mentative confrontations taking part in practices of political accountability. She does so by explaining how politicians maneuver strategically with the burden of proof in an attempt at winning the discussion in which they are involved. After making clear the role of the burden of proof in defining the difference of opinion in argumentative confrontations, the author outlines the constraints imposed by practices of political accountability on the burden of proof. Finally, she analyzes in detail a concrete case in which a politician maneuvers in such a way that his burden of proof is significantly diminished.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

33 (#432,611)

6 months
7 (#213,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.William P. Alston - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):172-179.
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.
Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition.Nicholas Rescher - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references