N. Muller Mirza and A.-N. Perret-Clermont (eds): Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Principles [Book Review]

Argumentation 24 (2):253-254 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10503-009-9176-5

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Psychosocial processes in argumentation.Nathalie Muller Mirza, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, Valérie Tartas & Antonio Iannaccone - 2009 - In Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education. Springer.
Argumentation and education.Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.) - 2009 - New York: Springer.
Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.
Mathematics and argumentation.Andrew Aberdein - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):1-8.
Argumentation in higher education: examples of actual practices with argumentation tools.Jerry E. B. Andriessen - 2009 - In Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education. Springer. pp. 195--214.
Introduction: Special Issue on Argumentation in Education in Scandinavia and England. [REVIEW]Richard Andrews & Frøydis Hertzberg - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (4):433-436.
What Students' Arguments Can Tell Us: Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education.Fabrizio Macagno & Aikaterini Konstantinidou - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):225-243.
Emmanuelle Danblon, Emmanuel de Jonge, Ekaterina Kissina & Loïc Nicolas (eds): Review of Argumentation et narration. [REVIEW]Marianne Doury - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):255-257.
Robert Trapp and Janice Schuetz (eds.) (1990),Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede. [REVIEW]G. Thomas Goodnight - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):309-314.
Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation.David M. Godden - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):219-243.
From Newtonian determinism to branching-space-time indeterminism.Nuel Belnap - 2007

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-11

Downloads
42 (#361,008)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references