Planning Following Stroke: A Relational Complexity Approach Using the Tower of London

, , , &
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fnhum.2014.01032

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

To appraise developmental difficulty or mental demand, relational complexity is not enough.Juan Pascual-Leone - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):843-844.
How Ravens Came to the Tower of London.Boria Sax - 2007 - Society and Animals 15 (3):269-283.
Systemic planning: Dealing with complexity by a wider approach to planning.Steen Leleur - 2007 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 9 (1-2):2-10.
Relational complexity metric is effective when assessments are based on actual cognitive processes.Graeme S. Halford, William H. Wilson & Steven Phillips - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):848-860.
Complexity: From formal analysis to final action.Douglas Frye & Philip David Zelazo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):836-837.
Relational complexity, the central executive, and prefrontal cortex.James A. Waltz, Barbara J. Knowlton & Keith J. Holyoak - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):846-847.
Is relational complexity a useful metric for cognitive development?Usha Goswami - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):838-839.
Planning processes and age in the five-disc Tower of London task.K. J. Gilhooly, L. H. Phillips, V. Wynn, R. H. Logie & S. Della Sala - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (4):339-361.
Generic planning: Research results and applications. [REVIEW]John N. Warfield - 1990 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 3 (4):91-113.
Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the Knight-knave task.Damian P. Birney & Graeme S. Halford - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):109 – 134.
Discontinuity and variability in relational complexity: Cognitive and brain development.Donna Coch & Kurt W. Fischer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):834-835.
Three-year-olds' theories of mind are symbolic but of low complexity.Graeme S. Halford & Glenda Andrews - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
: The development of deductive reasoning: How important is complexity?Graeme S. Halford & Glenda Andrews - 2004 - Thinking and Reasoning 10 (2):123 – 145.
Recognising relations: What can be learned from considering complexity.Katherine A. Livins & Leonidas A. A. Doumas - 2015 - Thinking and Reasoning 21 (3):251-264.
Relational processing is fundamental to the central executive and it is limited to four variables.Graeme S. Halford, Steven Phillips, William H. Wilson, Julie McCredden, Glenda Andrews, Damian Birney, Rosemary Baker & Bain & D. John - 2007 - In Naoyuki Osaka, Robert H. Logie & Mark D'Esposito (eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
22 (#690,757)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 6 references / Add more references