Facta Philosophica 7 (1):19-34 (2005)
One of the most common strategies in philosophical dispute is that of accusing the opponent of begging the question, that is, of assuming or presupposing what is to be proved. Thus, it happens quite often that the credibility of a philosophical argument is infected by the suspicion of begging the question. In many cases it is an open question whether the suspicion is grounded, and the answer lurks somewhere in the dark of what the proponent of the argument does not say. This is why it may take years, or even centuries, before the begging of the question is brought to light. But few philosophers would deny that once it is established that a certain argument begs the question, that argument has to be rejected without hesitation: question-begging arguments are bad arguments, hence one should not appeal to them. Logicians traditionally classify begging the question as a fallacy, that is, as a bad reasoning that seems good at first sight. The fallacy is known under the name of petitio principii. This paper originated in our dissatisfaction with definitions of petitio principii found here and there in logic textbooks. Although it is uncontroversial that there is something wrong with begging the question, it is not clear from those definitions what is wrong.
|Keywords||petitio principii begging the question circularity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic.R. M. Sainsbury - 2001 - Blackwell.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Petitio Principii and Circular Argumentation as Seen From a Theory of Dialectical Structures.Gregor Betz - 2010 - Synthese 175 (3):327-349.
“How Can a Philosophical Enquiry Be Conducted Without a Perpetual Petitio Principii?Frank Ramsey - unknown
Begging the Question.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.
Mind and Body, Form and Content: How Not to Do Petitio Principii Analysis.Louise Cummings - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (2):73-105.
Does the Consequence Argument Beg the Question?John Martin Fischer & Garrett Pendergraft - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):575-595.
Question-Begging Under a Non-Foundational Model of Argument.Peter Suber - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):241-250.
Running in Circles About Begging the Question.D. A. Truncellito - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (3):325-329.
Skepticism, Question Begging, and Burden Shifting.Paul K. Moser - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:209-217.
Begging the Question and Bayesians.Brian Weatherson - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30:687-697.
Locke's Essay Book I: The Question-Begging Status of the Anti-Nativist Arguments.Raffaella de Rosa - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):37-64.
Added to index2010-08-27
Total downloads251 ( #13,729 of 2,169,650 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #60,873 of 2,169,650 )
How can I increase my downloads?