Dissertation, Harvard University (2020)

Khalil Andani
Harvard University
This dissertation is an intellectual history of Muslim understandings of Qur’ānic Revelation from the first/seventh century to the fifth/eleventh century as presented in the Qur’ān, Sunni ḥadīth, Qur’ān commentary, Sunni kalām, Imami Shiʿi ḥadīth, and Shiʿi Ismaili philosophical theology. The study conceptualizes diverse Islamic theologies of revelation through an analytical framework featuring three hierarchical dimensions: 1) a Revelatory Principle representing differing conceptions of God’s Speech and Writing ; 2) a Revelatory Process describing various modes of divine/angelic sending down and inspiration through the Prophet Muhammad, and 3) Revelatory Products including qur’ānic recitation, scripture, the Prophetic Sunna, and the Shiʿi Imamate. The dissertation argues that Sunni and Shiʿi Muslims understood Qur’ānic Revelation through competing and often mutually contradictory models constructed within different historical and theological contexts. The revelatory models that developed through the fifth/eleventh century fall into four types: 1) the “qur’ānic model” in which the Prophet formulates divinely inspired Arabic qur’āns and prophetic guidance as adaptations of God’s transcendent writing; 2) the “scriptural models” from Sunni tafsīr in which the Qur’ān as God’s book pre-exists in heaven and is then sent down to earth; 3) the “theological divine speech models” in Sunni kalām that center on God’s uncreated/created speech and its manifestation as the Arabic Qur’ān and the Prophetic Sunna; 4) the “divine inspiration models” in Imami Shiʿi ḥadīth and Shiʿi Ismaili thought that frame the Qur’ān as a divinely inspired composition of the Prophet that manifests God’s transcendent word and requires the Imams’ revelatory hermeneutics to be comprehended. The dissertation’s argument culminates by highlighting and contextualizing Imami Shiʿi and Ismaili understandings of revelation espoused by certain Shiʿi Imams and Ismaili dāʿīs – including Imam al-Ṣādiq, Imam al-Muʿizz, al-Rāzī, the Brethren of Purity, al-Sijistānī, al-Nuʿmān, al-Kirmānī, al-Mu’ayyad, and Nāṣir-i Khusraw. It demonstrates that Ismaili models in particular constitute a unique alternative to Sunni views of revelation by offering competing and vastly different accounts of the Revelatory Principle, Process, and Products.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Revelation in Islam.Rodney Blackhirst - 1994 - Asian Philosophy 4 (1):71 – 79.
Two Models of Radical Revelation in Austrian Philosophy.Balazs Mezei - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):99 - 120.
From One Thousand and One Nights to Safavid Iran: A Persian Tawaddud.Rosemary Stanfield-Johnson - 2017 - Der Islam: Journal of the History and Culture of the Middle East 94 (1):158-191.
Revelation and Inspiration.Stephen T. Davis - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.
Some Imāmī-Shīʿī Views on Taqiyya.Etan Kohlberg - 1975 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 95 (3):395.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #892,751 of 2,411,842 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #74,977 of 2,411,842 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes