Roy Weintraub's Studies in Appraisal: Lakatosian Consolations or Something Else?

Economics and Philosophy 7 (2):221 (1991)
As made manifest by Clower's comments on their “science fiction” nature, general equilibrium theories present such peculiar and puzzling features that the methodologist must perforce seek some specific methodological accommodation for this part of economic theory. The role played by such theories in contemporary economics is so fundamental that the impossibility of appraising them by means of any version of falsificationism, and their patent lack of empirical content if approached with the conceptual devices of the methodology of scientific research programs, have prompted several scholars interested in the methodology of economics to search for a reasonable way out
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267100001401
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,463
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Andrea Salanti (1993). A Reply to Professor Weintraub. Economics and Philosophy 9 (1):139.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #409,296 of 1,925,534 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,489 of 1,925,534 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.