Asian Philosophy 22 (1):63-74 (2012)
In The Idea of Justice, Amartya Sen, among other things, discusses certain qualities any adequate theory of justice ought to incorporate. Two important qualities a theory of justice should account for are impartiality/objectivity and sensitivity to consequences. In order to motivate his discussion of sensitivity to consequences, Sen discusses the debate between Krishna and Arjuna from the religio-philosophical Hindu text the Bhagavad Gita. According to Sen, Arjuna represents a sensitivity to consequences while Krishna is an archetypal deontologist. In this paper it will be argued that Sen's interpretation of the Gita is inaccurate. Further, a more adequate interpretation will be presented. What will be of significance is that the more adequate interpretation actually demonstrates the importance of an impartial spectator in moral reasoning. Finally, there will be a discussion of some lessons that can be taken from the Gita regarding justice generally
|Keywords||Amartya Sen Justice Bhagavad Gita|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason.Amartya Sen - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (9):477-502.
The Bhagavad Gītā on War and Peace.K. N. Upadhyaya - 1969 - Philosophy East and West 19 (2):159-169.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Identity, Community, and Justice: Locating Amartya Sen's Work on Identity.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):251-266.
Sen's The Idea of Justice: Back to the (Pragmatic) Future.Brian E. Butler - 2010 - Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):219-229.
Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory.Pablo Gilabert - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):39-56.
Against Sen Against Rawls On Justice.Evan Riley - 2011 - Indian Journal of Human Development 5 (1):211-221.
Sen, Sraffa and the Revival of Classical Political Economy.Nuno Ornelas Martins - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):143 - 157.
Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: 'Good Enough' is Not Good Enough.Richard J. Arneson - unknown
Comparing the Bhagavad-Gita and Kant.Keya Maitra - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):63-67.
The Deliberative Democrat's Idea of Justice.J. S. Dryzek - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (4):329-346.
Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: 'Good Enough' is Not Good Enough Richard J. Arneson.Richard Arneson - manuscript
Symposium on Amartya Sen's Philosophy: 3 Sen and Consequentialism.T. M. Scanlon - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):39-50.
Added to index2012-04-11
Total downloads59 ( #87,689 of 2,158,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,668 of 2,158,677 )
How can I increase my downloads?