Sex Differences in Detecting Sexual Infidelity

Human Nature 19 (4):347-373 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Despite the importance of extrapair copulation (EPC) in human evolution, almost nothing is known about the design features of EPC detection mechanisms. We tested for sex differences in EPC inference-making mechanisms in a sample of 203 young couples. Men made more accurate inferences (φmen = 0.66, φwomen = 0.46), and the ratio of positive errors to negative errors was higher for men than for women (1.22 vs. 0.18). Since some may have been reluctant to admit EPC behavior, we modeled how underreporting could have influenced these results. These analyses indicated that it would take highly sex-differentiated levels of underreporting by subjects with trusting partners for there to be no real sex difference. Further analyses indicated that men may be less willing to harbor unresolved suspicions about their partners’ EPC behavior, which may explain the sex difference in accuracy. Finally, we estimated that women underreported their own EPC behavior (10%) more than men (0%)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex, gender, and difference.Victoria K. Burbank - 1992 - Human Nature 3 (3):251-277.
Extraversion, sexual experience, and sexual emotions.John Marshall Townsend - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):537-537.


Added to PP

107 (#168,225)

6 months
13 (#219,986)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Blame It on the Norm: The Challenge from “Adaptive Rationality”.Andrea Polonioli - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (2):131-150.
Blame It on the Norm.James Bohman - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (2):131-150.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references