The height?+?width rule in children's judgments of quantity

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.107.4.335
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Fortuitous Gap in Law and Morality.Yoram Shachar - 1987 - Criminal Justice Ethics 6 (2):12-36.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Height?+?Width Rule Seems Solid: Reply to Bogartz.Norman H. Anderson & Diane O. Cuneo - 1978 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 107 (4):388-392.
A Model-Theoretic Characterisation of Clique Width.Achim Blumensath - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 142 (1):321-350.
Height and Reproductive Success.Rebecca Sear - 2006 - Human Nature 17 (4):405-418.
Quantity and Quantity Value.Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari - 2011 - Proc. TC1-TC7-TC13 14th IMEKO Joint Symposium.
A Defence of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.Rex Martin - 1972 - Philosophy 47 (180):140 - 151.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #744,783 of 2,325,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #218,293 of 2,325,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature