The presuppositions of religious pluralism and the need for natural theology

Sophia 47 (2):201-222 (2008)

Abstract
In ‘The Presuppositions of Religious Pluralism and the Need for Natural Theology’ I argue that there are four important presuppositions behind John Hick’s form of religious pluralism that successfully support it against what I call fideistic exclusivism. These are i) the ought/can principle, ii) the universality of religious experience, iii) the universality of redemptive change, and iv) a view of how God (the Eternal) would do things. I then argue that if these are more fully developed they support a different kind of exclusivism, what I call rational exclusivism, and become defeaters for pluralism. In order to explain rational exclusivism and its dependence on these presuppositions I consider philosophers J.P. Moreland, William Lane Craig, and Alvin Plantinga, who offer arguments for their forms of exclusivism but I maintain that they continue to rely on fideism at important points. I then give an example of how knowledge of the Eternal can be achieved.
Keywords Pluralism  Natural theology  General revelation  Fideism  Fideistic exclusivism  Rational exclusivism  John Hick  Vivekananda  Vasubandhu  Nagarjuna  Immanuel Kant  Post-Kantian theology  William Rowe  J.P. Moreland  William Lane Craig  Alvin Plantinga  Sensus divinitatis  Intuition  Inference  Reason  Law of non-contradiction  Ought/can principle  Religious experience  Redemption  Special revelation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-008-0065-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Oxford University Press USA.
Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Mind 110 (440):1110-1115.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity.Philip L. Quinn & Kevin Meeker (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Defending Religious Pluralism for Religious Education.Andrew Davis - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
A Pragmatic Defense of Religious Exclusivism.Girard Brenneman - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:13-18.
In Defence of a Contented Religious Exclusivism.Jerome Gellman - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (4):401-417.
The Impossibility of a Pluralist View of Religions.Gavin D'Costa - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):223 - 232.
``Pluralism: A Defense of Religious Exclusivism&Quot.Alvin Plantinga - 1999 - In Kevin Meeker & Philip Quinn (eds.), The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 172-192.
Religious Pluralism Assessed.Avi Sagi - 1999 - Sophia 38 (2):93-115.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
154 ( #45,649 of 2,242,826 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #254,543 of 2,242,826 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature