Subjunctive Tu quoque Arguments. Commentary on Anderson, Aikin & Casey

Argumentation. Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tu quoque arguments regard inconsistencies in some speaker‘s performance. Most tu quoque arguments depend on actual inconsistencies. However, there are forms of tu quoque arguments that key, instead, on the conflicts a speaker would have, were some crucial contingent fact different. These, we call subjunctive tu quoque arguments. Finally, there are cases wherein the counterfactual inconsistencies of a speaker are relevant to the issue.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

You Would Sing Another Tune.Collin Anderson, Scott Aiken & John Casey - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):39-46.
Ad Hominem.George Wrisley - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 88–93.
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.Tracy Bowell - 2023 - Informal Logic 43 (1):91-112.
Tu quoque, Archbishop.Brendan Larvor - 2004 - Think 3 (7):101-108.
Tu Quoque.Roger Teichmann - 1987 - Analysis 47 (4):199 - 201.
Individualism and Self-Knowledge: Tu Quoque.Kelly Becker - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (3):289 - 295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
480 (#54,680)

6 months
113 (#48,266)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph Lumer
University Of Siena

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations