- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct: Commentary on ‘challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity’
Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):269-272 (2003)
Abstract
The nature of scientific societies’ relationships with their members limits their ability to promote research integrity. They must therefore leverage their strengths as professional organizations to integrate ethical considerations into their ongoing support of their academic disciplines. This paper suggests five strategies for doing so.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
The role of scientific societies in promoting research integrity.Mark S. Frankel & Stephanie J. Bird - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):139-140.
Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity.Felice J. Levine & Joyce M. Iutcovich - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):257-268.
Commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends" (b. mishkin).Debra M. Parrish - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):299-301.
Commentary on “the history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (c. pascal).Kenneth D. Pimple - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):203-204.
The american experience: Lessons learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics.Addeane S. Caelleigh - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):221-241.
Effectiveness of research guidelines in prevention of scientific misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond. [REVIEW]Chris B. Pascal - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):183-198.
An introduction to research ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
83 (#244,410)
6 months
11 (#295,908)
2009-01-28
Downloads
83 (#244,410)
6 months
11 (#295,908)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity.Felice J. Levine & Joyce M. Iutcovich - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):257-268.
Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-zrclg uwo