The tower experiment and the copernican revolution


Abstract
Abstract During the Copernican revolution the supporters of the Ptolemaic theory argued that the tower experiment refuted the Copernican hypothesis of the (diurnal) motion of the earth, but was in agreement with the Ptolemaic theory. In his defence of the Copernican theory Galileo argued that the experiment was in agreement both with Copernican and Ptolemaic theory. The reason for these different views of the same experiment was not that the two theories were incommensurable, as Paul Feyerabend argues, but that Galileo introduced a new theory of motion which he used as an auxiliary hypothesis in his discussion of the tower experiment, while those defending the Ptolemaic theory used the old Aristotelian theory of motion. Already before the Copernican revolution the Aristotelian theory of motion was criticized by philosophers in Paris, who suggested the impetus theory of motion. The later versions of this theory had the consequence that the tower experiment no longer refuted the hypothesis of the (diurnal) motion of the earth. Thus the impetus theory removed an old and important objection to the heliocentric theory. Galileo's inertial dynamics had the same function in the discussion of the tower experiment
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698599108573386
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,824
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Philosophy of Natural Science.Carl G. Hempel - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Experiments and Thought Experiments in Natural Science.David Atkinson - 2001 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 232:209-226.
Was There a Crisis Before the Copernican Revolution? A Reappraisal of Gingerich's Criticisms of Kuhn.Robert I. Griffiths - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:127 - 132.
Die Wissenschaftstheorie Galileis — Oder: Contra Feyerabend. [REVIEW]Klaus Fischer - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):165 - 197.
Einstein's Theory of Relativity.Max Born - 1965 - New York: Dover Publications.
The Rationality of the Copernican Revolution.Martin V. Curd - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:3 - 13.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-01

Total views
33 ( #285,819 of 2,309,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #761,345 of 2,309,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature