Why Bush should explain September 11th

In Patrick Hayden, Tom Lansford & Robert P. Watson (eds.), America's War on Terror. Ashgate Publishing. pp. 29-42 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There were various initial reactions to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, and among those reactions were some contradictions. There were those who demanded an explanation for the attacks, and others who condemned attempts to explain as immoral or unpatriotic. Though President George W. Bush did make some rhetorical remarks that, I believe, masqueraded as explanatory, it appears that he agrees with the latter set.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#205,488)

6 months
1 (#417,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristin Andrews
York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Studies in the Logic of Explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Four Decades of Scientific Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon & Anne Fagot-Largeault - 1989 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (2):355.
Interpretation Psychologized.Alvin I. Goldman - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (3):161-85.

View all 11 references / Add more references