(When) Is There a Christian Responsibility to Gossip?

Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 42 (1):135-151 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper offers a Thomistic defense of gossip as a licit means of protecting third parties from harm by known offenders. After first clarifying what constitutes gossip, it draws from Thomas Aquinas to identify the narrow set of conditions under which gossip might be both permissible and obligatory. It concludes by specifying how the duty to gossip might work in Christian institutions, and especially within institutions where there are weak systems of formal accountability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gossip as a Burdened Virtue.Mark Alfano & Brian Robinson - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (3):473-82.
Character, Caricature, and Gossip.Brian Robinson - 2016 - The Monist 99 (2):198-211.
Gossip and Social Punishment.Linda Radzik - 2016 - Res Philosophica 93 (1):185-204.
Responsibility and the Limits of Conversation.Manuel R. Vargas - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2):221-240.
The Virtue of Gossip.Jason van Niekerk - 2008 - South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):400-412.
The Sequential Organisation of Gossip Talk.Tugba Aslan - 2021 - Discourse Studies 23 (4):429-450.
Ryktenes Og Sladderens Pragmatikk.Steffen Borge - 2011 - Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 46 (1):49-58.
Pupils' Gossip as Remedial Action.Michael Tholander - 2003 - Discourse Studies 5 (1):101-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-19

Downloads
2 (#1,392,221)

6 months
2 (#275,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references