Welfare, Work Requirements, and Dependant-Care

Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):243-256 (2004)
the arguments in their favour are weak. Arguments based on reciprocity fail to explain why only means-tested public benefits should be subject to work requirements, and why unpaid dependant care work should not count as satisfying citizens’ obligations to reciprocate. Argu- ments based on promoting the work ethic misattribute recipients’ nonwork to deviant values, when their core problem is finding steady employment consistent with supporting a family and meeting dependant care responsibilities. Rigid work requirements impose unreasonable costs on some of the poor. A welfare system based on a rebuttable presumption that recipients will work for pay, conjoined with more generous work supports, would promote justice better than either unconditional welfare or strict requirements [1].
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00279.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.
After The Family Wage.N. Fraser - 1994 - Political Theory 22 (4):591-618.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Radical Liberalism, Rawls and the Welfare State: Justifying the Politics of Basic Income.Simon Birnbaum - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (4):495-516.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
102 ( #53,961 of 2,211,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #63,266 of 2,211,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature