Logica Universalis 3 (2):153-218 (2009)
My purpose here is purely historical. It is not an attempt to resolve the question as to whether Russell did or did not countenance nonclassical logics, and if so, which nonclassical logics, and still less to demonstrate whether he himself contributed, in any manner, to the development of nonclassical logic. Rather, I want merely to explore and insofar as possible document, whether, and to what extent, if any, Russell interacted with the various, either the various candidates or their, ideas that Dejnožka and others have proposed as potentially influential in Russell’s intellectual reactions to nonclassical logic or to the philosophical concepts that might contribute to his reactions to nonclassical logics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Citations of this work BETA
Jean van Heijenoort's Conception of Modern Logic, in Historical Perspective.Irving H. Anellis - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):339-409.
Similar books and articles
Russell's Paradox of the Totality of Propositions.Nino Cocchiarella - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (1):25-37.
Functorial Duality for Ortholattices and de Morgan Lattices.Katalin Bimbó - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (2):311-333.
Algunas aplicaciones filosóficas de las lógicas multivalentes.Lorenzo Peña - 1992 - Theoria 7 (1/2/3):141-163.
An Algebraic Approach to Non-Classical Logics.Helena Rasiowa - 1974 - Warszawa, Pwn - Polish Scientific Publishers.
Added to index2009-08-08
Total downloads46 ( #111,764 of 2,158,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #133,785 of 2,158,164 )
How can I increase my downloads?