Russell and his sources for non-classical logics

Logica Universalis 3 (2):153-218 (2009)

Abstract
My purpose here is purely historical. It is not an attempt to resolve the question as to whether Russell did or did not countenance nonclassical logics, and if so, which nonclassical logics, and still less to demonstrate whether he himself contributed, in any manner, to the development of nonclassical logic. Rather, I want merely to explore and insofar as possible document, whether, and to what extent, if any, Russell interacted with the various, either the various candidates or their, ideas that Dejnožka and others have proposed as potentially influential in Russell’s intellectual reactions to nonclassical logic or to the philosophical concepts that might contribute to his reactions to nonclassical logics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11787-009-0006-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,425
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Introduction to Non-Classical Logic.Graham Priest - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 110 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-08-08

Total views
54 ( #163,703 of 2,286,379 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #853,841 of 2,286,379 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature