Lucas Angioni
University of Campinas
I discuss some of Aristotle’s scattered remarks from which one can construct his conception of matter. Aristotle seems to oscillate between two conceptions: one in which matter is the principle of becoming, another in which matter is a constituent element with no contribution for processes of becoming. Sometimes Aristotle takes matter as a thing independent in itself, and the correlated form is a feature that does not contribute to the matter’s essence, nor is a necessary condition for its existence. But sometimes Aristotle takes matter as a constituent element the existence of which depends on the whole thing it is the matter of. These different approaches to matter seem to suggest an inconsistent theory of matter. However, I argue that, quite to the contrary, Aristotle has a consistent theory about matter. One of my main points is to distinguish contexts in which Aristotle is indeed talking about matter in general from contexts in which he uses the term “matter” to refer to a given thing that was previously taken as matter and to talk about that thing not qua matter, but qua the thing it is.
Keywords hilomorphism  ontology  causality  philosophy of nature  natural science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Hylomorphism and Functionalism.S. Marc Cohen - 1992 - In Martha Nussbaum & Amelie Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Clarendon Press. pp. 57-73.
Necessidade, Teleologia e Hilemorfismo em Aristóteles.Lucas Angioni - 2006 - Cadernos de História E Filosofia da Ciéncia 16 (1):33-57.
Living Bodies.J. Whiting - 1992 - In Martha C. Nussbaum & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s de Anima. Clarendon Press. pp. 75-91.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ontological Underpinnings of Aristotle's Philosophy of Science.Breno A. Zuppolini - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Campinas, Brazil
È possibile Una filosofia Della mente in aristotele?Barbara Botter - 2010 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 15 (1):49-86.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Necessidade, Teleologia e Hilemorfismo em Aristóteles.Lucas Angioni - 2006 - Cadernos de História E Filosofia da Ciéncia 16 (1):33-57.
La materia de Averroes.Antonio Pérez-Estévez - 1998 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 15:199-222.
A “superação" schellinguiana do entendimento plotiniano da transição do bem para a matéria e o mal.Edrisi Fernandes - 2013 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 10:127-140.
On Thomas Aquinas' Doctrine of Materia Signata.Dezhi Duan & Dunhua Zhao - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):552-562.
Teilhard's Law of Complexity-Consciousness.James F. Salmon - 2005 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (1):185 - 202.


Added to PP index

Total views
384 ( #25,678 of 2,498,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #36,196 of 2,498,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes