Coherence as a heuristic

Mind 117 (465):1-26 (2008)
The impossibility results of Bovens and Hartmann (2003) and Olsson (2005) call into question the strength of the connection between coherence and truth. As part of the inquiry into this alleged link, I define a notion of degree of truth-conduciveness, relevant for measuring the usefulness of coherence measures as rules-of-thumb for assigning probabilities in situations of partial knowledge. I use the concept to compare the viability of some of the measures of coherence that have been suggested so far under different circumstances. It turns out that all of these, including the prior, are just about equally good in cases of very little knowledge. Nevertheless, there are differences in when they are applicable, and they also depart more from each other when more knowledge is added. CiteULike    Connotea    What's this?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzn001
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,925
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Towards a Grammar of Bayesian Coherentism.Michael Schippers - 2015 - Studia Logica 103 (5):955-984.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
63 ( #100,013 of 2,272,742 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #57,510 of 2,272,742 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature