Journal of Business Ethics 134 (4):611-629 (2016)

Committing financial fraud is a serious breach of business ethics. However, there are few large scale studies of financial fraud, which involve ethical considerations. In this study, we investigate the pervasive financial scandals, which by the end of 2012 involved more than a third of the US-listed Chinese companies. Based on a sample of 262 US-listed Chinese companies, we analyze factors that differentiate between firms that commit financial fraud and those that do not. We find that firms more predisposed to unethical behavior, due to their low regional social trust in the home country and low respect for regulations and laws as proxied by political connections, are more likely to commit accounting and financial fraud. They take advantage of low hurdles for listing via reverse mergers and avoid third-party monitoring through poor governance and auditors. Finally, we find evidence, after these scandals, of non-fraudulent firms differentiating themselves from the fraudulent firms by sending costly signals such as insiders purchasing shares, increasing dividends, and going private.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2387-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,759
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Divine Mind.John Leslie - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47:73-89.
Are Bad Works of Art 'Works of Art'?Cyril Barrett - 1972 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 6:182-193.
Underdetermination.P. Kyle Stanford - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Do We See Apples as Edible?Bence Nanay - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):305-322.
Fruits, Apples, and Category Mistakes: On Sport, Games, and Play.Angela J. Schneider - 2001 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 28 (2):151-159.
Learning to Tell Apples From Oranges.Manfred Fahle - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (10):455-457.
Heracles and the Apples of the Hesperides: A New Type.K. A. McDowall - 1905 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 25:157-162.
Bad Apples: The Influence of Politics on Scholarship.Alan Soble - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):354-88.
Preston on Exaptation: Herons, Apples, and Eggs.Daniel C. Dennett - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy 95 (11):576-580.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #380,036 of 2,432,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,136 of 2,432,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes