Lucas Angioni
University of Campinas
Aristotle claims that the object of scientific knowledge cannot be otherwise, and at Posterior Analytics I-8 he adds that there is no scientific knowledge of corruptible objects. These claims have been traditionally understood in terms of a strict requirement of eternal existence: objects of genuine scientific knowledge must be eternal in the sense that they must exist eternally. Sometimes the "eternal existence" is taken by scholars as equivalent to the timeless truth of universal propositions. In this paper, I offer an alternative view and discuss Aristotle’s argument in Posterior Analytics I-8.
Keywords scientific explanation  essentialism  causality  demonstration  ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtuous Circles.Aldo Antonelli - 2000 - In Anil Gupta & Andre Chapuis (eds.), Circularity, Definition, and Truth. Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
Analysis and Science in Aristotle.Patrick H. Byrne - 1997 - State University of New York Press.
Aristotle on Episteme and Nous: The Posterior Analytics.Murat Aydede - 1998 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):15-46.
Aristotle's Two Worlds: Posterior Analytics 1.33.Gail Fine - 2010 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):323-46.


Added to PP index

Total views
184 ( #46,009 of 2,326,042 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #43,381 of 2,326,042 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes