On the consistency of Axel Honneth’s philosophy: Methodology, critique, and current struggles for recognition

Philosophical Forum 49 (4):483-509 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over three decades, Axel Honneth has developed one of the most fully-structured recognition paradigms in the field of social philosophy. Although it has undergone considerable theoretical changes, this paradigm retains a strong unity. I will analyze it in light of the Frankfurt school critical social theory research program. By so doing, I aim, first, to outline a defense of Honneth’s theory against growing criticisms, which tend to see depletion of its critical insights in his most recent works. Secondly, I aim to highlight that most of the weaknesses pointed out by his critics derive from the methodology with which Honneth frames the concept of recognition, and which he explicitly related to the Frankfurt school critical social theory. Thirdly, I argue that, insofar as we are at present witnessing a transformation in the nature of current struggles for recognition, it is precisely one of the premises of this methodology that runs the risk of being undermined (i.e. the classical relation between theory and “praxis”).

Similar books and articles

Herrschaft begreifen: Anerkennung und Macht in Axel Honneths kritischer Theorie.Amy Allen - 2014 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 62 (2):260-278.
Axel Honneth.Christopher Zurn - 2015 - Malden, MA: Polity.
Recognition as ideology.Axel Honneth - 2007 - In Bert van den Brink & David Owen (eds.), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 323--347.
Axel Honneth and the neo-Idealist turn in critical theory.Michael J. Thompson - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (8):779-797.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-20

Downloads
403 (#44,334)

6 months
401 (#3,732)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Angella
University Paris Nanterre

Citations of this work

Symmetry and interpretation: a deliberative framework for judging recognition claims.Diana Elena Popescu - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references