BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):4 (2012)

Authors
Charles Weijer
University of Western Ontario
Abstract
Background: Publication of ethically uncertain research occurs despite well-published guidelines set forth in documents such as the Declaration of Helsinki. Such guidelines exist to aide editorial staff in making decisions regarding ethical acceptability of manuscripts submitted for publication, yet examples of ethically suspect and uncertain publication exist. Our objective was to survey journal editors regarding practices and attitudes surrounding such dilemmas. Methods: The Editor-in-chief of each of the 103 English-language journals from the 2005 Abridged Index Medicus list publishing original research were asked to complete a survey sent to them by email between September-December 2007. Results: A response rate of 33% (n = 34) was obtained from the survey. 18% (n = 6) of respondents had published ethically uncertain or suspect research within the last 10 years. 85% (n = 29) of respondents stated they would always reject ethically uncertain articles submitted for publication on ethical grounds alone. 12% (n = 4) of respondents stated they would approach each submission on a case-by-case basis. 3% (n = 1) stated they would be likely to publish such research, but only with accompanying editorial. Only 38% (n = 13) give reviewers explicit instruction to reject submissions on ethical grounds if found wanting. Conclusions: Editorial compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki in rejecting research that is conducted unethically was difficult to ascertain because of a poor response rate despite multiple attempts using different modalities. Of those who did respond, the majority do reject ethically suspect research but few explicitly advise reviewers to do so. In this study editors did not take advantage of the opportunity to describe their support for the rejection of the publication of unethical research
Keywords Editors  Ethics  Publication ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-13-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,041
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and Editors.Yvonne Brackbill & André E. Hellegers - 1980 - Hastings Center Report 10 (2):20-24.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

PhD by Publication: A Student's Perspective.Lisa M. Robins & Peter J. Kanowski - 2008 - Journal of Research Practice 4 (2):Article M3.
Dual Use Research: Investigation Across Multiple Science Disciplines.Shannon Oltmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):327-341.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-12

Total views
68 ( #146,626 of 2,410,766 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #86,500 of 2,410,766 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes