Consensus and majoritarian democracies: Problems with under-informed single-level analyses

Human Affairs 31 (1):109-124 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I argue that when conceiving or assessing normative ideas about how we should organize society into the kind of ecosystem we desire, it is unwise to completely ignore empirical conditions. I also demonstrate that when evaluating empirical difficulties attending a social system, it is also unwise to do so in total oblivion to the normative idea or objective informing the establishment of such a system. Each of these assessments I call an under informed single-level analysis. By contrast I advocate a multi-level analysis (by which we evaluate both the normative and empirical dimensions of an idea or a social system) or, at the least, an informed single-level analysis (by which we evaluate either a normative idea or an empirical system with an implicit awareness of the content of the other level). I demonstrate that these models of analysis would never yield the same conclusions as an under informed single-level analysis. For my case studies I focus on the various models of analyses used in the debate about liberal majoritarian and consensus/communal democracies.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Obtaining informed consent for Cesarean sections in Bangladesh.Mohammad Mahodur Rahman - 2019 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 29 (4):119-125.
Single-Case Designs.Breanne Byiers - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 581-602.
What is Multi–level Modelling For?Stephen Gorard - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (1):46-63.
Multi-Level Democracy.Christoph Möllers - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (3):247-266.
Multi‐Level Democracy.Christoph Möllers - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (3):247-266.
On the Practical Impossibility of Being Both Well-Informed and Impartial.Sveinung Sundfør Sivertsen - 2019 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):52-72.
Collective informed consent and decision power.Jukka Varelius - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):39-50.
When consent is unbearable: an alternative case analysis.G. J. Agich - 1979 - Journal of Medical Ethics 5 (1):26-28.
The duty to be Well-informed: The case of depression.Charlotte Blease - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):225-229.


Added to PP

8 (#1,157,597)

6 months
3 (#503,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cultural universals and particulars: an African perspective.Kwasi Wiredu - 1996 - Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Facts and Principles.G. A. Cohen - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3):211-245.
Morality and Action.Warren Quinn - 1993 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Philippa Foot.
Morality and Action.Warren Quinn - 1993 - Philosophy 69 (270):513-515.
Essays on Bentham. Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory.H. L. A. Hart - 1984 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 174 (1):81-82.

View all 15 references / Add more references