Philosophical Psychology 34 (3):374-396 (2021)

Authors
Dong An
Zhejiang University
Abstract
Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson have argued that to evaluate the funniness of a joke based on the consideration of whether it is morally appropriate to feel amused commits the “moralistic fallacy.” We offer a new and empirically informed reply. We argue that there is a way to take morality into consideration without committing this fallacy, that is, it is legitimate to say that for some people, witty but immoral jokes can fail to be funny because they are immoral. In our account, one has an intramural moral reason not to feel amused if one focuses on the moral feature itself of a joke rather than the moral consequence implied in one’s reaction to the joke. When one judges a joke as not funny because of the intramural moral reason, one is in a negative emotional state with high arousal, for example, moral disgust or anger. This state is psychologically incompatible with amusement. That one has an intramural reason not to feel amused thus implies that one does not have a reason to feel amused. Moral consideration thus plays an indirect and appropriate role in the evaluation of the funniness of a joke.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2021.1874331
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
Moral Luck.B. A. O. Williams & T. Nagel - 1976 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 50:115 - 151.
Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?John Mcdowell & I. G. Mcfetridge - 1978 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 52:13-42.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Comic Immoralism and Relatively Funny Jokes.Scott Woodcock - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):203-216.
Racist Acts and Racist Humor.Michael Philips - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):75-96.
Truly Funny: Humor, Irony, and Satire as Moral Criticism.E. M. Dadlez - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):1-17.
Dirty Jokes, Tasteless Jokes, Ethnic Jokes.Al Gini - 2015 - Florida Philosophical Review 15 (1):50-65.
Just Kidding Folks! An Expressivist Analysis of Humor.Thomas Brommage - 2015 - Florida Philosophical Review 15 (1):66-77.
Heckler Ethics.Steven Gimbel - 2015 - Florida Philosophical Review 15 (1):78-87.
Funny Punny Logic.Alan Roberts - 2017 - Dialectica 71 (4):531-539.
Humor and Harm.Laurence Goldstein - 1995 - Sorites 3:27-42.
The Humor of Philosophy.Jeremiah Conway - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):3-10.
Not So Funny: A Deweyan Response.Cynthia Gayman - 2005 - Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (2):85-91.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-01-25

Total views
58 ( #198,215 of 2,520,354 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #116,855 of 2,520,354 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes