Historiography and postmodernism

Filozofski Vestnik 28 (1):121-139 (2007)

Abstract

We no longer have any texts, any past, but just interpretations of them. The evident multi -interpretability of a text causes it gradually to lose its capacity to function as arbiter in the historical debate. It is necessary to define a new link with the past based on a complete and honest recognition of the position in which we now see ourselves placed as historians. In recent years, many people have observed our changed attitude towards the phenomenon of information. For postmodernism, science and information are independent objects of study which obey their own laws. Language and art are not situated opposite reality but are themselves a pseudo-reality and are therefore situated within reality. Because of the relation between the historiographical view and the language used by the historian to express his view - a relation which nowhere intersects the domain of the past -historiography possesses the same opacity and intensional dimension as art. The essence of postmodernism is precisely that we should avoid pointing out essentialist patterns in the past. There is reason to assume that our relation to the past and our insight into it will in future be of a metaphorical nature rather than a literal one

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-30

Downloads
28 (#413,193)

6 months
1 (#387,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Ankersmit and Historical Representation.John Zammito - 2005 - History and Theory 44 (2):155–181.
A Theory of Historiography as a Pre-Science.Aviezer Tucker - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):633-667.
Historians and Moral Evaluations.Richard T. Vann - 2004 - History and Theory 43 (4):3–30.
History and the History of the Human Sciences: What Voice?Smith Roger - 1997 - History of the Human Sciences 10 (3):22-39.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Historiography and Postmodernism-Reply.F. R. Ankersmit - 1990 - History and Theory 29 (3):275-296.
Reply to Professor Zagorin.F. R. Ankersmit - 1990 - History and Theory 29 (3):275-296.
Kuhnian Consensus & Historiography.Adam Timmins - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (1):82-105.
Praxis and Agency in Foucault’s Historiography.Lynn Fendler - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (5-6):445-466.
Historiography and Postmodernism: Reconsiderations.Perez Zagorin - 1987 - History and Theory 26 (3):263-274.
Postmodernism and History.Willie Thompson - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Holocaust and the Postmodern.Robert Eaglestone - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Representationalism and Non-Representationalism in Historiography.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):453-479.