Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):355-373 (2004)
In this article I use Baudrillard’s claim that systems of exchange are ontologically and historically prior to systems of production, and Arendt’s understanding of birth as the arrival of something both quite familiar and quite new into the world as the starting-points for a theory of labour as relation. Such a theory has the virtue of avoiding the problem, found in Marx, Arendt and elsewhere, that labour is both a vital feature of being human and yet a drudgery that will be absent from post-revolutionary society (in the case of Marx) or strictly relegated to the private realm (for Arendt). It also involves repositioning the work of social reproduction – of which women’s labour in giving birth is exemplary – as paradigmatic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Being-From-Others: Reading Heidegger After Cavarero.Lisa Guenther - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (1):99-118.
Similar books and articles
The Preeminence of Use: Reevaluating the Relation Between Use and Exchange in Aristotle's Economic Thought.Todd S. Mei - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 523-548.
More on Exploitation and the Labour Theory of Value.G. A. Cohen - 1983 - Inquiry 26 (3):309 – 331.
Les Rapports d'Échange Selon Aristote. Éthique À Nicomaque V Et VIII-IX.Gilles Campagnolo & Maurice Lagueux - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (3):443-469.
I. Marx's Analysis of Commodity Exchange—a Reply to Carver.Ulrich Steinvorth - 1976 - Inquiry 19 (1-4):99 – 108.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #296,378 of 2,164,552 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,486 of 2,164,552 )
How can I increase my downloads?