Neuroeducation–a critical overview of an emerging field

Neuroethics 5 (2):105-117 (2012)

Abstract   In the present article, we provide a critical overview of the emerging field of ‘neuroeducation’ also frequently referred to as ‘mind, brain and education’ or ‘educational neuroscience’. We describe the growing energy behind linking education and neuroscience in an effort to improve learning and instruction. We explore reasons behind such drives for interdisciplinary research. Reviewing some of the key advances in neuroscientific studies that have come to bear on neuroeducation, we discuss recent evidence on the brain circuits underlying reading, mathematical abilities as well as the potential to use neuroscience to design training programs of neurocognitive functions, such as working memory, that are expected to have effects on overall brain function. Throughout this review we describe how such research can enrich our understanding of the acquisition of academic skills. Furthermore, we discuss the potential for modern brain imaging methods to serve as diagnostic tools as well as measures of the effects of educational interventions. Throughout this discussion, we draw attention to limitations of the available evidence and propose future avenues for research. We also discuss the challenges that face this growing discipline. Specifically, we draw attention to unrealistic expectations for the immediate impact of neuroscience on education, methodological difficulties, and lack of interdisciplinary training, which results in poor communication between educators and neuroscientists. We point out that there should be bi-directional and reciprocal interactions between both disciplines of neuroscience and education, in which research originating from each of these traditions is considered to be compelling in its own right. While there are many obstacles that lie in the way of a productive field of neuroeducation, we contend that there is much reason to be optimistic and that the groundwork has been laid to advance this field in earnest. Content Type Journal Article Category Original Paper Pages 1-13 DOI 10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3 Authors Daniel Ansari, Numerical Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, Westminster Hall, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada Bert De Smedt, Parenting and Special Education Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Roland H. Grabner, Institute for Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Journal Neuroethics Online ISSN 1874-5504 Print ISSN 1874-5490
Keywords Neuroeducation  Mind, brain and education  Educational neuroscience  Reading  Numeracy  Arithmetic  Brain imaging  Brain training
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,822
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Training and Plasticity of Working Memory.Torkel Klingberg - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (7):317-324.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Deneurologizing Education? From Psychologisation to Neurologisation and Back.Jan De Vos - 2015 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 34 (3):279-295.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neuroethics.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Vilayanur Ramachandran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 3e. Elsevier.
What Can Neuroscience Bring to Education?Michel Ferrari - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):31-36.
The Birth of a Field and the Rebirth of the Laboratory School.Marc Schwartz & Jeanne Gerlach - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):67-74.


Added to PP index

Total views
61 ( #134,838 of 2,265,056 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #289,000 of 2,265,056 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature