Are our concepts conscious state and conscious creature vague?

Erkenntnis 68 (2):239 - 263 (2008)
are sharp rather than vague, that they can have no borderline cases. On the other hand, many who take conscious states to be identical to, or realized by, complex physical states are committed to the vagueness of those concepts. In the paper I argue that conscious state and conscious creature are sharp by presenting four necessary conditions for conceiving borderline cases in general, and showing that some of those conditions cannot be met with conscious state. I conclude that conscious state is sharp, and the conclusion is then extended to conscious creature. The paper ends with a brief discussion of some implications
Keywords Consciousness  Phenomenal consciousness  Conscious state  Conscious creature  Phenomenology  Vagueness  Borderline case  Concept  Conception
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-007-9061-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,545
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - Routledge.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ordinary Objects.Daniel Z. Korman - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Vagueness and the Metaphysics of Consciousness.Michael V. Antony - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 128 (3):515-538.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
562 ( #4,578 of 2,287,891 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #16,724 of 2,287,891 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature