A Revision-Theoretic Analysis of the Arithmetical Hierarchy

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (2):204-218 (1994)
Authors
G. Aldo Antonelli
University of California, Davis
Abstract
In this paper we apply the idea of Revision Rules, originally developed within the framework of the theory of truth and later extended to a general mode of definition, to the analysis of the arithmetical hierarchy. This is also intended as an example of how ideas and tools from philosophical logic can provide a different perspective on mathematically more “respectable” entities. Revision Rules were first introduced by A. Gupta and N. Belnap as tools in the theory of truth, and they have been further developed to provide the foundations for a general theory of (possibly circular) definitions. Revision Rules are non-monotonic inductive operators that are iterated into the transfinite beginning with some given “bootstrapper” or “initial guess.” Since their iteration need not give rise to an increasing sequence, Revision Rules require a particular kind of operation of “passage to the limit,” which is a variation on the idea of the inferior limit of a sequence. We then define a sequence of sets of strictly increasing arithmetical complexity, and provide a representation of these sets by means of an operator G(x, φ) whose “revision” is carried out over ω2 beginning with any total function satisfying certain relatively simple conditions. Even this relatively simple constraint is later lifted, in a theorem whose proof is due to Anil Gupta.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1094061861
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,865
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Proof Theory for Functional Modal Logic.Shawn Standefer - 2018 - Studia Logica 106 (1):49-84.
On Revision Operators.P. D. Welch - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):689-711.
Guest Editors’ Introduction.Riccardo Bruni & Shawn Standefer - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-9.
What's in a Function?Gian Aldo Antonelli - 1996 - Synthese 107 (2):167 - 204.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Vagueness and Revision Sequences.C. M. Asmus - 2013 - Synthese 190 (6):953-974.
Presentence, Revision, Truth, and Paradox. [REVIEW]Nuel Belnap - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):705–712.
Gupta's Rule of Revision Theory of Truth.Nuel D. Belnap - 1982 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1):103-116.
On Revision Operators.P. D. Welch - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):689-711.
What's in a Function?Gian Aldo Antonelli - 1996 - Synthese 107 (2):167 - 204.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
34 ( #188,569 of 2,293,801 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #252,839 of 2,293,801 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature