Leibniz and the post-Copernican universe. Koyré revisited

This paper employs the revised conception of Leibniz emerging from recent research to reassess critically the ‘radical spiritual revolution’ which, according to Alexandre Koyré’s landmark book, From the closed world to the infinite universe was precipitated in the seventeenth century by the revolutions in physics, astronomy, and cosmology. While conceding that the cosmological revolution necessitated a reassessment of the place of value-concepts within cosmology, it argues that this reassessment did not entail a spiritual revolution of the kind assumed by Koyré, in which ‘value-concepts, such as perfection, harmony, meaning and aim’ were shed from the conception of the structure of the universe altogether. On the contrary, thanks to his pioneering intuition of the distinction between physical and metaphysical levels of explanation, Leibniz saw with great clarity that a scientific explanation of the universe which rejected the ‘closed world’ typical of Aristotelian cosmology did not necessarily require the abandonment of key metaphysical doctrines underlying the Aristotelian conception of the universe. Indeed the canon of value-concepts mentioned by Koyré—meaning, aim, perfection and harmony—reads like a list of the most important concepts underlying the Leibnizian conception of the metaphysical structure of the universe. Moreover, Leibniz’s universe, far from being a universe without God—because, as Clarke insinuated, it does not need intervention from God—is a universe which in its deepest ontological fabric is interwoven with the presence of God.Author Keywords: Leibniz; Koyré; Clarke; Universe; Cosmology; Harmony
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S0039-3681(03)00021-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,463
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Daniel Garber (1995). Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy. In Nicholas Jolley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press. pp. 270--352.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
R. M. (2003). Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyre Revisited. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books.
Claus Beisbart & Tobias Jung (2006). Privileged, Typical, or Not Even That? – Our Place in the World According to the Copernican and the Cosmological Principles. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):225 - 256.
Alexandre Koyré (1968). Metaphysics and Measurement. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
B. J. (2001). History of Science Through Koyre's Lenses. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):243-263.
Ramon Jansana (2003). Leibniz Filters Revisited. Studia Logica 75 (3):305 - 317.
Alexandre Koyré & I. Bernard Cohen (1962). Newton and the Leibniz--Clarke Correspondence. Archives Internationales d'Historie des Sciences 15:63--126.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

19 ( #243,710 of 1,925,534 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #187,179 of 1,925,534 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.