Leibniz's Contribution to the Theory of Innate Ideas

Philosophy 47 (180):113 - 124 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does Leibniz really worst Locke in respect of innate ideas, as is frequently supposed, or does Locke emerge more or less whole from their epistemological dispute? I shall here argue that Leibniz does far less well than we might like to believe and that his substantive proposals, where not entirely innocuous, contain little that would appeal to anyone interested in a modern form of the innateness thesis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
55 (#212,060)

6 months
2 (#276,659)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthony Savile
King's College London

Citations of this work

Popper’s Evolutionary Therapy to Meno’s Paradox.Vikram Singh Sirola & Lalit Saraswat - 2019 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 36 (1):151-166.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A New Look at the Problem of Innate Ideas.Nicholas Rescher - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):205-218.

Add more references