Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98 - 101 (2005)

Authors
Anthony Ellis
Virginia Commonwealth University
Abstract
In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it is justifiable to set up the system in this way in the first place, then this justification will transmit to all actions carried out under it; and that it is justifiable to set up an institution of punishment in this way
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00388.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,558
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Deterrence Theory of Punishment.Anthony Ellis - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):337–351.
The Right to Threaten and the Right to Punish.Warren Quinn - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (4):327-373.
Who May Carry Out Protective Deterrence?By Michael Sprague - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):445–447.
Who May Carry Out Protective Deterrence&Quest.Michael Sprague - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):445-447.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Skepticism About Moral Responsibility.Gregg D. Caruso - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2018):1-81.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Deterrence Theory of Punishment.Anthony Ellis - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):337–351.
Who May Carry Out Protective Deterrence?By Michael Sprague - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):445–447.
''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Facing the Consequences.Nathan Hanna - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):589-604.
The Subjective Experience of Punishment.Adam J. Kolber - 2009 - Columbia Law Review 109:182.
Punishment.Christopher Bennett - 2004 - Philosophical Books 45 (4):324-334.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Punishment and the Duties of Offenders.R. A. Duff - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):109-127.
Punishment as Penalty.Suzanne Uniacke - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):37-47.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
59 ( #161,394 of 2,348,563 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #329,903 of 2,348,563 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes