"Who should survive?: One of the choices on our conscience": Mental retardation and the history of contemporary bioethics
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):205-224 (2006)
: The film "Who Should Survive?: One of the Choices on Our Conscience" contains a dramatization of the death of an infant with Down syndrome as the result of the parents' decision not to have a congenital intestinal obstruction surgically corrected. The dramatization was based on two similar cases at The Johns Hopkins Hospital and was financed by the Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr., Foundation. When "Who Should Survive?" was exhibited in 1971, the public reaction was generally critical of the parents' decision and the physicians' inaction. Although technological developments in medicine were a necessary condition for the production of this film and its unanticipated reception, they were not a sufficient condition. The proximate cause was a changed understanding of the capabilities of individuals with Down syndrome. Part of the impetus for this change was data showing the adverse effects of institutionalization on normal children
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Review of Ruth Levy Guyer. Baby at Risk: The Uncertain Legacies of Medical Miracles for Babies, Families, and Society. [REVIEW]John D. Lantos - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (10):45 – 46.
Similar books and articles
Child Welfare Versus Parental Autonomy: Medical Ethics, the Law, and Faith-Based Healing.Kenneth Hickey & Laurie Lyckholm - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):265-276.
Knowing Right From Wrong: A Christian Guide to Conscience.Thomas D. Williams - 2008 - Faith Words.
The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source.John J. Hardt - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Sex Between People with "Mental Retardation": An Ethical Evaluation.Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):155-169.
Review of Holly Fernandez Lynch, Conflicts of Conscience in Health Care: An Institutional Compromise. [REVIEW]Armand Matheny Antommaria - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):63-64.
What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Is It Wrong to Deliberately Conceive or Give Birth to a Child with Mental Retardation?Simo Vehmas - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):47 – 63.
Of Atkins and Men: Deviations From Clinical Definitions of Mental Retardation in Death Penalty Cases.John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson & Christopher Seeds - unknown
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #299,413 of 2,172,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?