Philosophy 43 (166):309 - 323 (1968)
The phrase, ‘political obligation’, is far more popular in English than in other European languages. Whether this may be due to historical circumstances, or to a peculiar bent of the English mind, is a fascinating question; but it is not the one which I propose to discuss here today. I am mentioning it only to explain the choice of my subject, a subject which would probably sound rather uncommon to an Italian audience, but which, I am sure, has a familiar ring to English ears. My subject, I would like to emphasise, is the nature of political obligation; my approach will be analytical rather than historical; and indeed, let me say at once that this lecture is a kind of examen de conscience in which I am myself involved, since I feel personally responsible for having introduced the phrase into my own native language, and for having used it during a life-time as if its meaning were self-evident, without ever raising the questions which I want to raise today
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Samaritanism and Political Obligation: A Response to Christopher Wellman's “Liberal Theory of Political Obligation”.George Klosko - 2003 - Ethics 113 (4):835-840.
Freedom, Reason, and the Polis: Essays in Ancient Greek Political Philosophy.David Keyt & Fred Dycus Miller (eds.) - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Francisco Suárez on Consent and Political Obligation.Daniel Schwartz - 2008 - Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
What is Political About Political Obligation? A Neglected Lesson From Consent Theory.Dorota Mokrosińska - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):88-108.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads19 ( #261,763 of 2,178,228 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,623 of 2,178,228 )
How can I increase my downloads?