Analytic isomorphism and speech perception

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):748-749 (1998)
Abstract
The suggestion that analytic isomorphism should be rejected applies especially to the domain of speech perception because (1) the guiding assumption that solving the lack of invariance problem is the key to explaining speech perception is a form of analytic isomorphism, and (2) after nearly half a century of research there is virtually no empirical evidence of isomorphism between perceptual experience and lower-level processing units.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X98221753
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,925
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Charting Speech with Bats Without Requiring Maps.Jagmeet S. Kanwal - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):272-273.
Fodor, Modularity, and Speech Perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):317-330.
Isomorphism in Information-Carrying Systems.John Kulvicki - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):380-395.
A Logical Analysis of 'Psychological Isomorphism'.Edward H. Madden - 1957 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (November):177-191.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
23 ( #262,793 of 2,272,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #149,323 of 2,272,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature