“Group Rights” and Racial Affirmative Action

Journal of Ethics 15 (3):265-280 (2011)
Abstract
This article argues against the view that affirmative action is wrong because it involves assigning group rights. First, affirmative action does not have to proceed by assigning rights at all. Second, there are, in fact, legitimate “group rights” both legal and moral; there are collective rights—which are exercised by groups—and membership rights—which are rights people have in virtue of group membership. Third, there are continuing harms that people suffer as blacks and claims to remediation for these harms can fairly treat the (social) property of being black as tracking the victims of those harms. Affirmative action motivated in this way aims to respond to individual wrongs; wrongs that individuals suffer, as it happens, in virtue of their membership in groups. Finally, the main right we have when we are being considered for jobs and places at colleges is that we be treated according to procedures that are morally defensible. Morally acceptable procedures sometimes take account of the fact that a person is a member of a certain social group.
Keywords Affirmative action  Collective rights  Diversity  Group rights  Harm  Identitarian harms  Identity  Membership rights  Probabilistic harms  Race
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10892-011-9103-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Harm to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):295-298.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights?Erol Kuyurtar - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
Group-Differentiated Rights and the Problem of Membership.Suzy Killmister - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):227-255.
The Case Against Affirmative Action.Louis P. Pojman - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):97-115.
The Complexity of Groups: A Comment on Jorge Valadez.Martha Nussbaum - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (1):57-69.
Group Risks, Risks to Groups, and Group Engagement in Genetics Research.Daniel M. Hausman - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):351-369.
Affirmative Inaction? The Aftermath of Grutter and Gratz.Richard A. Jones - 2004 - Radical Philosophy Review 7 (2):179-193.
Policies of Straw or Policies of Inclusion?Albert Mosley - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):161-168.
All Rights Are Affirmative.Brian E. Butler - 2001 - Radical Philosophy Review 4 (1/2):95-101.
Affirmative Action in Post-Apartheid South Africa.George Carwe - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:77-94.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-18

Total downloads

125 ( #37,342 of 2,153,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

13 ( #40,325 of 2,153,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums