Merging information versus speech recognition

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):325-326 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Norris, McQueen & Cutler claim that all known speech recognition data can be accounted for with their autonomous model, “Merge.” But this claim is doubly misleading. (1) Although speech recognition is autonomous in their view, the Merge model is not. (2) The body of data which the Merge model accounts for, is not, in their view, speech recognition data. Footnotes1 Author is also affiliated with the Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, [email protected].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lexical biases are useful.José R. Benkí - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):326-327.
Hesitations and clarifications on a model to abandon feedback.Louisa M. Slowiaczek - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):347-347.
Merging speech perception and production.Antje S. Meyer & Willem J. M. Levelt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):339-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#457,344)

6 months
10 (#309,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references