For over thirty years, scholars, courts, defense attorneys and prosecutors have been deeply troubled by the guilty plea procedure, concerned about the sacrifice of rights and due process for cheap efficiency. Although many legal players seem to dislike the plea, few have taken on its reform. With the Supreme Court's recent iteration of the jury's constitutional rights and powers in criminal adjudication, however, a way to meaningfully reform the guilty plea has finally arisen. I propose incorporating the community into the guilty plea process through the use of a plea jury. With a plea jury, a lay panel of citizens would listen to the defendant's allocution and determine the acceptability of the plea and sentence, reinvigorating the community's right to determine punishment for offenders. My goal in this piece is to restore the community jury right to its proper place by envisioning its integration into the guilty plea, theoretically as well as procedurally. In doing so, I will illustrate not only how a standard jury would be incorporated, but also why the critical norms embedded into jury participation will help improve the existing guilty plea procedure.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Condorcet's Jury Theorem and the Optimum Number of Voters.Jason Brennan - forthcoming - POLITICS.
Fairness and the Willingness to Accept Plea Bargain Offers.Avishalom Tor, Oren Gazal-Ayal & Stephen M. Garcia - unknown
A Tale of Two Waivers: Waiver of the Jury Waiver Defense Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Jarod Spencer Gonzalez - unknown
Re-Justifying the Fair Cross Section Requirement: Equal Representation and Enfranchisement in the American Criminal Jury.Richard M. Re - unknown
To Waive or Not to Waive: The Right to Trial and Plea Bargaining. [REVIEW]Richard L. Lippke - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):181-199.
A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Jurors Have the Same Evidence.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2004 - Synthese 142 (2):175 - 202.
The Michigan Supreme Court Diminishes the Right to Trial by Jury in Civil Cases.Robert A. Sedler - manuscript
Added to index2009-02-10
Total downloads6 ( #563,340 of 2,177,875 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,247 of 2,177,875 )
How can I increase my downloads?