Russian Studies in Philosophy 48 (3):9-25 (2009)

The author questions the validity of Kant's insistence on the absoluteness of the requirement "Do not lie" as well as the very possibility of absolute moral principles in general. He argues for applied ethics, the object of which would be individual-situational behavior and the rules and requirements of which have a concrete situational character. He points out that Kant's insistence on the absoluteness contradicts the humanity imperative, especially its requirement to treat others as an end in itself. He stresses that the requirement of the unconditional impermissibility of lying leads to a concealed justification of treachery, which should be considered another type of lying
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.2753/RSP1061-1967480301
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,803
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #308,707 of 2,401,581 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,581 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes