An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility

&
Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):314-322 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We obtain an equiconsistency for a weak form of universal indestructibility for strongness. The equiconsistency is relative to a cardinal weaker in consistency strength than a Woodin cardinal. Stewart Baldwin's notion of hyperstrong cardinal. We also briefly indicate how our methods are applicable to universal indestructibility for supercompactness and strong compactness

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2178/jsl/1264433923

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Universal indestructibility for degrees of supercompactness and strongly compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (2):133-142.
Weak Indestructibility and Reflection.James Holland - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):980-1006.
Universal partial indestructibility and strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):524-531.
Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem.Arthur W. Apter - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):288-293.
Some remarks on indestructibility and Hamkins? lottery preparation.Arthur W. Apter - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (8):717-735.
Indestructibility under adding Cohen subsets and level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (3):271-279.
Indestructibility, instances of strong compactness, and level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (7-8):725-741.
Supercompactness and level by level equivalence are compatible with indestructibility for strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):155-163.
Indestructible strong compactness and level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2013 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 59 (4-5):371-377.
Supercompactness and measurable limits of strong cardinals II: Applications to level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):457-463.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
78 (#227,643)

6 months
10 (#305,310)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Indestructible Strong Unfoldability.Joel David Hamkins & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):291-321.
The large cardinals between supercompact and almost-huge.Norman Lewis Perlmutter - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (3-4):257-289.
Weak Indestructibility and Reflection.James Holland - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):980-1006.
Indestructibility of Vopěnka’s Principle.Andrew D. Brooke-Taylor - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (5-6):515-529.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Higher Infinite.Akihiro Kanamori - 2000 - Studia Logica 65 (3):443-446.
[Omnibus Review].Akihiro Kanamori - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):864-866.
The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
Gap forcing: Generalizing the lévy-Solovay theorem.Joel David Hamkins - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.

View all 6 references / Add more references